Skip to content

Glossary

EBITDA Add-Backs

Adjustments made to reported EBITDA to normalise earnings by removing one-off, non-recurring, or non-operational items — producing an adjusted EBITDA figure used as the basis for deal valuation.

What Are EBITDA Add-Backs?

EBITDA add-backs are adjustments that increase (or decrease) reported EBITDA to produce a normalised earnings figure that more accurately reflects the sustainable run-rate profitability of a business. They are central to M&A valuation because transaction multiples are applied to adjusted EBITDA, not reported EBITDA.

Common legitimate add-backs include:

  • One-off costs — restructuring charges, legal settlements, one-time advisory fees
  • Owner compensation above market — personal expenses run through the business, above-market owner salary
  • Non-recurring revenue adjustments — extraordinary income items that won’t repeat
  • Transaction costs — professional fees incurred in connection with the sale
  • New lease accounting adjustments — IFRS 16 or ASC 842 impacts

Why Add-Backs Matter for Valuation

If a business is valued at 7x EBITDA and the seller claims $1M in EBITDA add-backs, the purchase price impact is $7M. This makes add-back negotiations one of the most commercially significant parts of any deal.

Buyers scrutinise every add-back claim during quality of earnings review. The key questions are:

  1. Is the item genuinely non-recurring, or is it a regular cost of doing business?
  2. Is it properly supported by documentation?
  3. Would a buyer face a similar cost post-close?

Common Add-Back Disputes

The most frequently contested add-backs in lower mid-market transactions include:

  • Owner salary excess — sellers claim their salary is above market; buyers argue it reflects market rate
  • “One-off” costs that recur — legal fees, consultant costs, or IT projects that appear every year
  • New hire costs — costs incurred replacing a departed executive
  • COVID or macro-event adjustments — claimed revenue or cost impacts that are difficult to substantiate

Add-Backs in Earnout Structures

When earnouts are tied to EBITDA targets, the definition of EBITDA — including which add-backs are permitted — is explicitly negotiated and documented in the SPA. Poorly defined EBITDA definitions are a primary source of post-close earnout disputes.

Related Terms

Related Articles